Object Storage shortlist: Backups / archives
Filter object storage providers by your cloud alignment, workload type, and cost sensitivity. Egress fees are the hidden cost most teams underestimate—a provider that looks cheap on storage can become expensive once high-bandwidth data retrieval starts. Cloud-native providers (S3, GCS, Azure Blob) offer tight ecosystem integration; independent providers (Cloudflare R2, Backblaze B2) offer better egress economics. Use these filters to identify which providers fit your architecture and cost model before comparing feature details.
4 products match your constraints
Each product below fits the filters you selected. Click through to read the full decision brief — pricing behavior, limits, and what breaks first.
Hyperscaler object storage standard for unstructured data with deep AWS integrations, broad tooling support, and multiple storage classes. Total cost is often driven by egress and requests, not storag…
Wasabi
Cost-driven, S3-compatible object storage commonly evaluated for backups and large storage footprints. Buyers choose it when predictable storage economics matters more than hyperscaler ecosystem bread…
Cost-driven object storage for backups and media libraries, often evaluated versus Wasabi and S3 when the decision is pricing mechanics (egress + requests) rather than raw storage price.
IDrive e2 is an S3-compatible object storage from IDrive, focused on affordable pricing with zero egress fees. It's evaluated when buyers want cost-driven storage with immutable backups for ransomware…
Share this shortlist
Send this URL to your team — it preserves your exact filter selections.
Refine your shortlist
Change a filter to see which products match different constraint combinations.