Firebase Authentication vs Supabase Auth
Why people compare these: Product teams compare them when selecting an auth layer that best matches their application stack and long-term authorization model.
The real trade-off: Firebase Auth is SDK-first login for apps; Supabase Auth is auth that’s intentionally coupled to a Postgres-first backend and RLS authorization model.
Common mistake: Teams choose based on ‘easiest signup’ and ignore the real constraint: which stack you’re committing to for data + authorization and how expensive switching becomes later.
At-a-glance comparison
Firebase Authentication ↗
Firebase Authentication provides SDK-driven login for web and mobile with minimal backend work. It’s best when you want fast shipping and your identity needs don’t include deep B2B enterprise…
- ✓ Very fast implementation for mobile and web with SDKs
- ✓ Works well with Firebase ecosystem (Firestore, Hosting, Functions)
- ✓ Supports multiple identity providers with minimal setup
Supabase Auth ↗
Supabase Auth is authentication integrated into a Postgres-first backend, designed to pair login with database-backed authorization (RLS) and app data. It’s best when you want one cohesive stack and…
- ✓ Tight coupling with Postgres + Row Level Security for authorization
- ✓ Good fit when you want auth + database + storage in one platform
- ✓ Supports common login patterns (email/password, OAuth providers, JWT)
Where each product pulls ahead
These are the distinctive advantages that matter most in this comparison.
Firebase Authentication advantages
- ✓ Fast SDK-driven auth for mobile/web with minimal backend work
- ✓ Strong fit with Firebase ecosystem for rapid app development
- ✓ Lower initial complexity for standard authentication needs
Supabase Auth advantages
- ✓ Auth aligned with Postgres and RLS authorization model
- ✓ Cohesive platform for auth + database patterns
- ✓ Clear data-centric approach to multi-tenant access via policies
Pros & Cons
Firebase Authentication
Pros
- + You’re mobile-first and already invested in Firebase services
- + You want fast SDK integration with minimal backend identity work
- + Your authorization model is simple and can live in custom claims/backends
- + You want the smallest number of moving parts for login UX today
- + Enterprise SSO is not an immediate requirement
Cons
- − Enterprise B2B features like SAML/SCIM are not Firebase’s core strength
- − Advanced role/governance models often require custom backend work
- − Phone/SMS auth and abuse prevention can introduce cost/rate constraints
- − Multi-tenant SaaS patterns can require additional architecture
- − Limited workforce governance compared to Okta/Entra
- − Vendor coupling to Firebase/Google stack
- − Complex migrations require careful planning
Supabase Auth
Pros
- + You want a Postgres-first backend where auth and authorization are tightly aligned
- + You plan to use Row Level Security (RLS) as your primary access model
- + You want fewer vendors and a cohesive database + auth platform
- + You can own policy testing and governance for RLS over time
- + You’ll plan for CIAM if enterprise SSO/provisioning becomes mandatory
Cons
- − Enterprise CIAM depth (SSO/provisioning/governance) may require additional tooling
- − Auth becomes coupled to your backend stack choice (switching cost)
- − Advanced identity workflows can push you beyond platform defaults
- − B2B requirements can expand scope (org roles, audits, provisioning)
- − Operational maturity still required (abuse, recovery flows, monitoring)
- − Some teams prefer dedicated CIAM platforms for enterprise procurement needs
- − Migration complexity increases once auth is deeply embedded in data layer
Which one tends to fit which buyer?
These are conditional guidelines only — not rankings. Your specific situation determines fit.
- → Pick Firebase Auth if: you want SDK-first authentication aligned to the Firebase ecosystem and your authorization needs are standard.
- → Pick Supabase Auth if: you want auth + Postgres-first authorization (RLS) to be one system and you can govern policies carefully.
- → Both can ship fast; the long-term cost is switching stacks once identity and authorization are deeply embedded.
- → The trade-off: ecosystem simplicity vs Postgres-first cohesion—not ‘which login screen looks nicer.’
Sources & verification
We prefer to link primary references (official pricing, documentation, and public product pages). If links are missing, treat this as a seeded brief until verification is completed.